Hello IPMAT aspirants! I’m Runal Naik from AcademyCheck. This September 2026 research ranks options only on quantitative aptitude faculty, the reason named in the title.
How AcademyCheck ranked quantitative aptitude faculty
35% - named faculty and disclosed experience: institute age was not treated as every teacher's tenure.
25% - observable teaching: priority went to a full concept, PYQ or problem-solving class instead of a promotional reel.
20% - IPMAT-specific progression: the course had to connect foundations with IPMAT-level Quantitative Aptitude.
10% - doubt and feedback support: live clarification, evaluated work or mentor access had to be visible.
10% - quantitative practice: topic tests, DPPs, books, sectionals or mock analysis had to reinforce the teaching.
Provider claims are labelled. AcademyCheck ratings are editorial unless a linked profile score and review count are stated.
Ranking at a glance
Rank | Institute |
|---|---|
1 | |
2 | |
3 | |
4 | |
5 | |
6 | |
7 |
1. LPT
AcademyCheck editorial rating: 4.5/5⭐ - based on the current title-specific faculty evidence, not a permanent platform review score.
Faculty Name - Experience - Subject/Role:
Pradeep Bharti - 20+ years - Senior Quant Mentor
Romit Sharma - 10+ years - Quantitative Aptitude and LRDI Mentor
Raghvendra Sharan Dwivedi - 12+ years - Quantitative Aptitude and LRDI Mentor
Mukesh Semwal - 12+ years - Quantitative Aptitude and LRDI Mentor
Why it is ranked #1:
Criterion evidence: LPT presents four named Quantitative Aptitude and LRDI mentors with 20+, 12+, 12+ and 10+ years of experience.
Rank boundary: this is the deepest title-relevant combination of named faculty and disclosed experience in the revised comparison, placing LPT above Career Launcher, IMS India and SuperGrads.
Teaching sample: Request one normal Quantitative Aptitude class from the teacher assigned to the exact 2027 batch before paying.
2. Career Launcher
AcademyCheck editorial rating: 4.3/5⭐ - the linked Lucknow branch profile is 4.0/5 from 3 reviews; it is a branch signal, not a national faculty score.
Faculty Name - Experience - Subject/Role:
Gautam Puri - 30+ years - Quantitative Aptitude
Amitendra Kumar - 20+ years - Aptitude mentor
Manu Bali - 12+ years - Quantitative Aptitude and Reasoning
Why it is ranked #2:
Criterion evidence: Career Launcher publishes the strongest individual tenure in this list, including Gautam Puri at 30+ years and other senior aptitude faculty.
Rank boundary: it sits below LPT because LPT presents four named Quantitative Aptitude and LRDI mentors with disclosed experience, but Career Launcher remains above IMS India on individual QA tenure.
Teaching sample: No suitable full provider class was verified; request one.
3. IMS India
AcademyCheck editorial rating: 4.7/5⭐ - the linked Koramangala profile currently has 0 reviews.
Faculty Name - Experience - Subject/Role:
Durga Shankar Bussetti - 17 years - aptitude mentoring
Danish Patel - 9 years - Mathematics and Quantitative Aptitude
Amar Surdik - 7+ years - Quantitative Aptitude
Why it is ranked #3:
Criterion evidence: IMS publishes a broad IPM/BBA mentor roster with named experience across Mathematics and aptitude preparation.
Rank boundary: it follows Career Launcher because Career Launcher discloses deeper QA-specific tenure, and it sits above SuperGrads in the revised order. Request a full class from the assigned teacher.
Teaching sample: No suitable full provider class was verified; request one.
4. SuperGrads
AcademyCheck rating: 4/5⭐ - 4.0/5 from 2 reviews on the linked Hyderabad profile.
Faculty Name - Experience - Subject/Role:
Anil Sable - 21+ years - Quantitative Aptitude and Mathematics
Tapesh Saxena - 19+ years - Quantitative Aptitude and LRDI
Mayur Mishra - senior QA, DI and LR subject-matter expert; numeric tenure is not stated on the cited page
Why it is ranked #4:
Criterion evidence: SuperGrads publishes three named senior Quantitative Aptitude specialists and a current IPMAT-labelled teaching sample.
Observable teaching: a current IPMAT-labelled Number System class connects factor theory with IPMAT Indore previous-year questions.
Rank boundary: it is placed fourth after LPT, Career Launcher and IMS India in the revised order, while remaining above AceIPM because its published QA roster includes deeper numeric teaching experience.
Teaching sample: Number System and IPMAT Indore PYQs. Observed method: The class moves from factor theory to IPMAT Indore previous-year questions.
Provider teaching-sample image. Open the linked full lesson; reach is not teaching-quality proof.
5. AceIPM
AcademyCheck editorial rating: 4.6/5⭐ - no dedicated AcademyCheck profile was found on 17 September 2026, so no profile review score is presented as fact.
Faculty Name - Experience - Subject/Role:
Swapnil Bhartiya - numeric teaching tenure not published - Quantitative Aptitude
Why it is ranked #5:
Criterion evidence: AceIPM links a focused IPMAT course to named subject teachers and a direct Quantitative Aptitude practice class.
Rank boundary: it sits below SuperGrads because SuperGrads publishes a deeper senior QA bench and a current IPMAT teaching sample.
Teaching sample: Surds, Indices and Identities by Swapnil Sir. Observed method: This named Quant practice class shows worked examples and progression.
Provider teaching-sample image. Open the linked full lesson; reach is not teaching-quality proof.
6. IPM Careers
AcademyCheck editorial rating: 4.5/5⭐ - the linked New Delhi profile is 4.0/5 from 1 review.
Faculty Name - Experience - Subject/Role:
Ashutosh Mishra - numeric teaching tenure not published - IIM Ahmedabad alumnus and IPM mentor
Deepak Kushwaha - numeric teaching tenure not published - IIM Lucknow alumnus and IPM mentor
Why it is ranked #6:
Criterion evidence: its specialist IPM focus, IIM-alumni mentor credentials and direct aptitude demo make the teaching offer inspectable.
Rank boundary: it follows AceIPM because the public faculty evidence is qualification-led and does not disclose comparable teaching tenure.
Teaching sample: Time and Work demo class. Observed method: The direct aptitude demo shows Quant sequencing, worked steps.
7. AfterBoards
AcademyCheck editorial rating: 4.2/5⭐ - no dedicated AcademyCheck profile was found on 17 September 2026, so this is an editorial score rather than a student-review score.
Faculty Name - Experience - Subject/Role:
Bhavesh Shaha - numeric teaching tenure not published - co-founder and IIM Ranchi alumnus
Vani Agrawal - numeric teaching tenure not published - co-founder and IIM Indore alumna
Dedicated QA roster - not published on the cited team page
Why it is ranked #7:
Criterion evidence: AfterBoards is useful as a low-cost practice platform with visible founders, adaptive practice and exam-specific mocks.
Rank boundary: it ranks seventh because the checked pages do not disclose a dedicated QA roster, numeric teaching tenure or a normal named-faculty Quant class.
Teaching sample: One-month IPMAT strategy sample. Observed method: The public sample is strategy-led rather than a normal named-faculty class.
Evidence-backed category leaders
Decision category | Current leader | Evidence-based reason |
|---|---|---|
Overall Quantitative Aptitude faculty evidence | LPT | Four named Quantitative Aptitude and LRDI mentors with 20+, 12+, 12+ and 10+ years of disclosed experience. |
Longest named individual QA tenure | Career Launcher | Gautam Puri is disclosed at 30+ years, supported by additional named aptitude faculty. |
Observable IPMAT teaching sample | SuperGrads | Its current IPMAT-labelled Number System class connects factor theory with IPMAT Indore previous-year questions. |
IPMAT-specific practice structure | AceIPM | Connects concept videos, books, quizzes, live boosters and a named Quant practice class. |
AcademyCheck view: LPT is ranked first on the title's faculty criterion because the revised evidence block names four Quantitative Aptitude and LRDI mentors with 20+, 12+, 12+ and 10+ years of experience. SuperGrads is fourth. Ratings and profile reviews are supporting signals; students should still verify the teacher assigned to their exact batch.
Three checks before paying
Request the 2027 trainer or test calendar.
Inspect one normal class or report.
Compare written fees, validity and replacement terms.
Student-specific verdict
Choose LPT when you want the deepest named Quantitative Aptitude and LRDI faculty bench in this revised comparison. Choose Career Launcher when long individual teacher tenure and a wide centre network matter more. Choose SuperGrads when you value its current IPMAT concept-to-PYQ teaching sample, and AceIPM for a specialist IPMAT practice sequence. Inspect the assigned teacher before paying.
Frequently asked questions
Why is LPT ranked first?
LPT presents four named Quantitative Aptitude and LRDI mentors with 20+, 12+, 12+ and 10+ years of experience, giving it the deepest title-relevant faculty block in the revised comparison.
Does rank one suit every student?
No. Verify the exact 2027 teacher, timetable, mode and feedback process.
What should I inspect before paying?
Check the cited proof, one ordinary class or report, and written fees and inclusions.
Why is SuperGrads ranked fourth?
SuperGrads has a strong named senior QA bench and a useful IPMAT teaching sample, but the revised order places LPT, Career Launcher and IMS India above it.
Do results and ratings prove teaching quality?
No. They are signals; this ranking uses observable quantitative aptitude faculty evidence and stated limits.
Summary
LPT ranks first in this revised Quantitative Aptitude faculty comparison, followed by Career Launcher, IMS India and SuperGrads. AceIPM and IPM Careers remain specialist options with less tenure disclosure, while AfterBoards is stronger as a practice layer than as verified faculty-led coaching.
Read more useful articles that can help you in your exam preparation.
AcademyCheck online IPMAT coaching guide and AcademyCheck IPMAT preparation and interview guide.
AcademyCheck support and corrections
Institutes may request a correction with current proof through AcademyCheck or the AcademyCheck StudySpace community.
Student Support: 01169270926
Academy Support and correction WhatsApp: 8287604941
PG/Hostel Support: 9319397093
Email: connect@academycheck.com
Explore coaching options on AcademyCheck
Click here to check the Fees, Results, Facilities, and & more teaching videos on AcademyCheck: Career Launcher.
Click here to check the Fees, Results, Facilities, and & more teaching videos on AcademyCheck: IMS.
Click here to check the Fees, Results, Facilities, and & more teaching videos on AcademyCheck: SuperGrads.
Click here to check the Fees, Results, Facilities, and & more teaching videos on AcademyCheck: IPM Careers.
Community perspectives: Quora and Reddit
For another student perspective, read this Quora answer about choosing online IPMAT coaching. Quora and Reddit posts reflect personal experiences, so use them to prepare questions rather than as proof of results. Recheck current faculty, fees, batch size, mock support and refund terms before enrolling. An exam-specific Reddit link can be added when supplied.
Important note and AcademyCheck support
Note: The fees mentioned in this blog may vary. For the exact course price, please contact the number given below.
Note: If any coaching institute finds their details to be incorrect, please accept our apologies. You can share the correct information along with the blog link on our WhatsApp number: 8287604941.
Enroll through AcademyCheck to access the best discounts and complete coaching details such as address, fees and upcoming batch dates.
Visit website: AcademyCheck
Student Support: 01169270926
Academy Support: 8287604941
PG/Hostel support: 9319397093
For more such informative articles and details, please visit our StudySpace profile, and don't forget to like and comment.
